djfitzo

LOBO wrote:I think the whining has stopped to a degree , its only lought constantly going on about pav not being included in the team, but for the good part ive not seen any whining about the team.

djfitzo wrote:

LOBO wrote:I think the whining has stopped to a degree , its only lought constantly going on about pav not being included in the team, but for the good part ive not seen any whining about the team.

See above from Lought about if teams we beat took their chances, nothing to do with Pav. Those same teams were taking their chances
and we was losing and crumbling under pressure, but not any more, but that still aint good enough. Ade has come in for some stick from Lought, same as Crouch did, but Ade's overall contribution is a million miles from Crouch, set Defoe up for his goal and VDV in another game and probably others, then someone mentioned that he helped out in defence and Lought found a problem with that, do you remember Crouchs contribution to defending, oh yeah, an own goal againsy Citeh!!

I guess Lought moaned about buying Friedel and Parker, our two best players that have made a huge difference.

There been any discussion about Taraabt, who many on here thought that he could not cut it in the prem and guess what, he cant cut it in the prem.

Like I said before i took a sabbatical, im all for healthy debate, constant nick picking aint that!!

Loughtonlegend wrote:so you want to leave the board because you dont agree with other post.

since the gooners have been banned from posting on here everyone now gets bored and argues aganst each other.

you arnie max ect. yet nobody left when it was the aol boards.

why dont you admit your bored having nobody to moan at so take it out on other posters

Loughtonlegend wrote:adel played well earlier in the season but lacks fitness and joey barton who now takes every free kick yet still not scored

i never ever said ade is bad. hes 100 times better then crouch
uf you read my post propley then you see i said he shouldnt be playing 90 mins every game

it was only 3 weeks ago harry said ade shouldnt be playin as hes carrying an injury yet ade wants to play and we stil play him 90 mins

we been lucky for ages and luck can only go on for so long

Loughtonlegend wrote:blackburn had more chances then us.

Don't talk cack. They had more ATTEMPTS but fewer on target. You could hit the corner flag 15 times and it will still be recorded as an attempt on goal. We also dominated the possession 55 to 45%.


wigan prob not but they had a man less in second half but they was unlucky

Outclassed, not unlucky. We had 64% of the possession in the match, away from home. two thirds! And you think they were unlucky? More shots in total, more on target, total dominance. Honestly, you are so anti Spurs sometimes it defies belief.

fulham had more shots then us.

So what? Our defence was comfortable through the majority of the match and the final 5 minutes flattered their stats. Yes they were the better side, so what? I've lost count of the times we have dominated and lost. I have NEVER EVER seen you say we were unlucky there though, just that we weren't good enough.

Anti Spurs yet again.

Are you Mark Lawrenson?


newcastle could of won the game if it had gone on any longer

Idiotic statement of the year here. If the game had gone on longer we could have won it too. FFS Lought, engage your sense before typing please.