Rumour emerging that we have signed Sulley Muntari

ionman34 wrote:

burger777 wrote:i think the ones that were trying to persuade a poster how to think, by using all kinds of different tactics have been found out mate

Really? No one else brought the subject up, you did. As for the 'trying to persuade a poster how to think' comment ................ What do you think an argument is for? Putting your point forward to try and persuade the other that you are right.

I wonder at you sometimes, you do tend to display a frightening lack of comprehension at times. Just what is your definition of an argument?

, if u guys feel better for trying to nail me, so be it

It's not about us feeling better about 'outing' you, it's about revealing your duplicitous nature, what with you being a goon and all. I've said on numerous occasions that I agree with Lought on Adels ability. That's irrelevant now. He's gone, old news and is only brought up by those trying to bring a pot to boil ............... You.

You failed .............. Jog on.

, the tarrabt subject has been going on for ages, i only got involved when i thut the name callin and slurs were getting a bit close to the edge

Like I said, you brought him into the thread, unnecessarily. On a wind up.


Don't kid a kidder, you must have missed that earlier.

and it was only then, lought is making alot comments reference players bent,defoe,crouch reguarlay make an appearance, if i was on one, do u not think i may be sticking my tuppence worth in there as well

Couldn't give a sh*t. If you did you'd get found out there too. You saw an opportunity, as this one got heated, and did your best to fan the flames. Sitting there all wide eyed and innocent isn't fooling anyone.

well i dont because i dont agree with him that bent is better than defoe, so u and others can try and drag my name down if u want ion, i honestly couldn give a fcuk, but get your facts right mate before u do

Not too difficult when your that transparent. As for your name .............. You're a goon on a Yid board ..................


You seem to have an inflated opinion of your name if you think we could drag it any lower!!

as for winde ups anyway do u think i need to use lought to winde people up on here

Yes. Your previous attempts got you looking a little foolish as I remember.


Certainly made you quiet for a spell anyway.

lol i only have to mention the word fickle to get the feathers spraying everywhere, so tut tut you for being wrong and double tut tut for false accussations.

Now I know you're a Poker player and I've met quite a few like you in my time, blissfully ignorant of the fact that there are others out there who possess the same skills, the same ability to read others, blissfully unaware that there are others out there who do it better.

These guys are known as Fish. Easily read, easily dealt with.


I seem to recall that we've had this conversation before.

BazSpur wrote:Well, debate and argument are always about persuasion, I think telling someone how to think is not the right phrase. Anyway its not working as Lought is still sticking to his guns and quite rightly too if that's how he feels.

burger777 wrote:

BazSpur wrote:Well, debate and argument are always about persuasion, I think telling someone how to think is not the right phrase. Anyway its not working as Lought is still sticking to his guns and quite rightly too if that's how he feels.

no its not working baz your right, but no need for the hiarchy to post to lought about what they think im thinking, especially when there wrong, i find this type of posting very cowardly and very sneaky, if people have probs with me, take it up with me, dont try and second guess me and convince others your right, if lought thinks im using him to get at others, im sure he would be cute enough to suss it out for himself, the fact im not, he has no need to, me and lought have had our dissagreements about many things, so for the boards members who think otherwise, i will say it for the last i aint, subject closed as far as i am concerned.

lewspurs wrote:
I think he may have been referring to me ion ! in another thread i said to burger that he was belittling loughts intelligence by his bleating on about mixed opinions on here about taarabt.

Plus he (burger) has brought up name calling etc etc that refers to the argument i had on here with lought, also about rep points (you see burger cant let it rest) (rehash the old venomous posts to get them an airing again)

Lets end that once and for all burger, i apologised to lought for that evening, i apologised to him about the rep points and we have moved on..... lought and me were talking the other night as if nothing has ever happened because i am sure he doesnt hold grudges, as i myself dont ! you on the other hand ?

burger777 wrote:

lewspurs wrote:
I think he may have been referring to me ion ! in another thread i said to burger that he was belittling loughts intelligence by his bleating on about mixed opinions on here about taarabt.

Plus he (burger) has brought up name calling etc etc that refers to the argument i had on here with lought, also about rep points (you see burger cant let it rest) (rehash the old venomous posts to get them an airing again)

Lets end that once and for all burger, i apologised to lought for that evening, i apologised to him about the rep points and we have moved on..... lought and me were talking the other night as if nothing has ever happened because i am sure he doesnt hold grudges, as i myself dont ! you on the other hand ?

lew when u and whoever else posted to lought advising him about me, was when the post turned personal, loughts a big boy and handles himself very well on here, he dont need bad advice so u can get your points across. i agreed and still do on his veiws about tarrabt, sorry that p*sses u off, but get used to it.