The Bill Nicholson Forum

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 04:21

Guest: Guest

Post n°1

vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 04:21

has he got a clause in hes contract he must start every game if fit.

its a joke that everytime hes fit he walks back into the team.

we need to start playing 442 again like we did last season

by **HotspurRoper** Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:21

HotspurRoper

HotspurRoper: Moderator

Post n°2

Re: vdv

by HotspurRoper Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:21

AGREED!!!!!

by philip Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:41

philip

philip: 2nd Division

Post n°3

Re: vdv

by philip Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:41

And he should stop being disrespectful to the manager and the Team by alwys heading for the tunnel when substituted

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 08:34

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°4

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 08:34

Yup lets get rid of him. How many corners has he taken and we haven't scored from them ? Fekin useless. His only goals have come from football being played and that just isn't good enough. He's got more goals than Pav & Defoe put together but he only scores when we play 4-5-1. He's not been fully fit since 1876 yet still we play him. What a waste of a million Ugandan Dollars he was. That midfield player that plays for that other team is so much better than him and why we ever sold Andy Reid is beyond me because he would have been so much beter than VDV is had he have stayed. Joe Jordan's to blame. He should have head-butted VDV rather than Gattuso, might have knocked some sense into him. How dare we play a player who isn't playing better for another team. Did you know theres a midfielder who plays out the park on a Sunday who has scored 35 goals this season ? We need him rather than VDV (blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblah ad nauseum et infinitum) . . . . . . .

by **BazSpur** Sun Mar 20 2011, 08:40

BazSpur

BazSpur: Admin

Post n°5

Re: vdv

by BazSpur Sun Mar 20 2011, 08:40

Classic Vis, REPPED.

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 08:46

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°6

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 08:46

how the hell did you get a rep for that load of tosh

i assume you been drinking vis. who said get rid of vdv

all we sayin is he keeps gettin rushed back.

he shouldnt start every game. he thinks hes the star at the club.

if hes told to play in a 442 then he should stay up front.

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 09:08

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°7

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 09:08

Lought if you can't take some tounge-in-cheek stick back then I appologise, but thats the way I'm going to deal, tonight, with you slagging off Spurs and the players. Your glass half empty attitude I find negative & uninspiring, so as you correctly state I've been on the Stella, I shall answer it with humour & zaniness . . . . . . .

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 09:12

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°8

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 09:12

Lought it seems that unless we win by loads og goals you have to find a whipping boy. For ages it was Crouchinio. Then Defoe and now VDV. We didn't lose today and we are still in the mix, so cheer up have another WKD and if you're lucky next season we will be playing against your avatar because, as you posted elsewhere, Spurs form is relegation form and we may go down yet . . . . . .

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 09:21

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°9

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 09:21

i said crouch is good for the team but is a crap striker. i have always said defoe is overated. i duno about u but i got the feeling he didnt want to score today.

whats wrong with having a player having to work hes way back into the team

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 09:25

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°10

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 09:25

I dunno about you Lought but to state Defoe didn't what to score today is the biggest load of Bollox ever. Sorry to say that Lought but that is a ridiculous statement and beggars belief.
I'm gob smacked to say the least.
Who are you saying should work their way back into the team Lought ?
VDV, Defoe or thaat brilliant player for some one else A.N.Other . . . . . .

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 09:42

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°11

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 09:42

even when defoe was 2 yards with time he stil lashed at hes shot n hit it right at green. in fact all of defoes shots straight at him. you cant defend him today. he had more chances here then he did aganst blackpool.

pav looked good today when he came on. hes movment into space. he set up defoe. time for pav to get a run in the team.

for what its worth i thought harry got it wrong today and should of brough crouch on aswell seeing as they aint good at dealing wiv crosses

by shearspur Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:06

shearspur

shearspur: Champions League

Post n°12

Re: vdv

by shearspur Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:06

defoe didnt want to score ?? is that why i noticed he had a t shirt under his shirt with 100 goals written on it ready to celebrate with the supporters, maybe he was to desperate to score today and thats what went wrong

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:09

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°13

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:09

For what it is worth Lought you have made a staement that in your opinion Defoe didn't score today because he didn't want to. Did he have money on a 0-0 d'ya think ? Maybe if he had of scored today the goal bonus would have f*cked his tax return for the end of the fiscal year ? Maybe he's still a Bubble Blower at heart and so is 'arry and thats why 'arry played an attacking team just so as West Ham would defend like hell and acheive a well-earnt, deserved 0-0 ? The b*stards are all in collusion together. It's a conspiracy I tells ya, a nailed on conspiracy . . . . .

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:16

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°14

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:16

well hows this for a conspiracy.

harry loves west ham. they beat us then got a draw today.
avan grant always tends to beat us

fa cup semi final portsmouth who had so many injurys yet stil beat us even though they had there best player out and was bottom

lets be honest we all thought harry was dodgy but now hes here we have 2 ignore all that and say we always liked him.

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:17

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°15

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:17

harry wearing the 100 goals tshirt. see its all about him. prob made him even more greedy today.

jermain its a team game

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:19

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°16

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:19

i meant defoe lol

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:23

Guest

Guest: Guest

Post n°17

Re: vdv

by Guest Sun Mar 20 2011, 10:23

PMSL Lought that extra WKD I suggested is doing the trick . . . . . . .

by djfitzo Sun Mar 20 2011, 19:39

djfitzo

djfitzo: International

Post n°18

Re: vdv

by djfitzo Sun Mar 20 2011, 19:39

Loughtonlegend wrote:harry wearing the 100 goals tshirt. see its all about him. prob made him even more greedy today.

jermain its a team game

What a shame, I'd have loved to see Harry sprint onto the pitch, strip off his jacket, shirt and tie to reveal, Jermains got a hundred goals!!

Colusion, bollox, we beat West Ham home and away last season and Harry was manager then, sometimes Lought, I do wonder who you support or in your case not.

by Sponsored content

Re: vdv

by Sponsored content

Team	P	W	D	L	GD	Pts
1. Chelsea	38	26	9	3	41	87
2. Man City	38	24	7	7	45	79
3. Arsenal	38	22	9	7	35	75
4. Man Utd	38	20	10	8	25	70
5. Tottenham	38	19	7	12	5	64
6. Liverpool	38	18	8	12	4	62
7. Soton	38	18	6	14	21	60
8. Swansea	38	16	8	14	-3	56
9. Stoke City	38	15	9	14	3	54
10.C.Palace	38	13	9	16	-4	48
11.Everton	38	12	11	15	-2	47
12.West Ham	38	12	11	15	-3	47
13.West Brom	38	11	11	16	-13	44
14.Leicester	38	11	8	19	-9	41
15.Newcastle	38	10	9	19	-23	39
16.Sunderland	38	7	17	14	-22	38
17.Aston Villa	38	10	18	20	-26	38
18.Hull City	38	8	11	19	-18	35
19.Burnley	38	7	12	19	-25	33
20.QPR	38	8	6	24	-31	30