Very quiet.

Yes.

I thought I'd never say this , but roll on transfer window , gives us something to talk about .

PS arselol to lose tomorrow Newcastle win away ,we win and get 3RD spot , a*se finish 5TH .

nervous

An aside.

City or Utd?

Not who you think will finish top. just who do you hate least.

Screw UTD seriously , CITY all the way

Not a lover of either really, so it pains me to say, UTD. Based on, City buying power has been a factor and I hate the way they have skewed the transfere market.

City for me too

cstmrsking wrote:Not a lover of either really, so it pains me to say, UTD. Based on, City buying power has been a factor and I hate the way they have skewed the transfere market.

Utd have always bought the best players , they stole a few from us , and now theres a team who has more clout than them they don't like it and accuse citeh of buying success when in fact utd have been doing the same for years , city for me

i think man c have been the best team have the beast sqaud. but i can see them only drawing aganst qpr

can also see sunderland getting points aganst man u
.
i had a power nap earlyer and dreamt arsnal drew 0 0
we drew 00 but newcastle came from behind to beat chelsea 3 2. but then when i woke i relsied they aint playing chelsea lol so make what u want of this

LOBO wrote:

cstmrsking wrote:Not a lover of either really, so it pains me to say, UTD. Based on, City buying power has been a factor and I hate the way they have skewed the transfere market.

Utd have always bought the best players , they stole a few from us , and now theres a team who has more clout than them they don't like it and accuse citeh of buying success when in fact utd have been doing the same for years , city for me

LOBO, I know what you saying. I just feel that Man U have built a team up as well as spent. They have been able to spend based on being sucsessful. I just feel that the majority of Citehe sucsess is due to spending power.

same here utd for me, city are gonna ruin football now cos there on a different level of buying. if they didnt have the money we may be in 3rd or fighting for 2nd.

cstmrsking wrote:Not a lover of either really, so it pains me to say, UTD. Based on, City buying power has been a factor and I hate the way they have skewed the transfere market.

Really cant agree kingy, and dont forget we dont usually argue. lol.
Look how much city have had to spend to get above united, well done to them is all i have to say.
Ferguson really p*sses me off, complains about new levels of transfer fees and pays £31 mill for berbatoff, also accepts £70 mill for ronaldo, just funny aint it.
Good on mancini and man city, thats a fck all season for united and old big nose, i win it all, aint i great ferguson.
Took a fortune to beat united but, hey ! maybe levy might learn a thing or two in this game that is all about money.

Lew, no argument here mate. Just, opinion and debate.

No i know kingy, lol, was just pointing out that if man city hadnt spent big, man utd would have skated it, and been miles ahead of everyone.
Thats what it takes in this game to stop the entitled, thinking, they are entitled to winning everything , every season.
I find what city have done is refreshing, and spurs, top 4 for years was , united, chelsea, goons and scousers,that has been challenged, great in my book.

vis wrote:I agree with you about the "choosen few" Lew and the way ourselves and Citeh have shaken things up and I have a feeling next season will see ever more clubs in the fight for those elusive 3rd & 4th spots . . . . .

Hi vis, yes i think you are right, more clubs will start making progress up the prem.
I was thinking that it was typical of an ex spurs goalie to make mistakes that gave the goons the 3 points at wba, but i always knew with spurs that cl qualification would go right to the wire, now we have to sweat on the final on the 19th may...