Search
Latest topics
Most active topics
Most Viewed Topics
Spurs Legends
Former Spurs Manager: Keith Burkinshaw
Affiliates
Log in
did he mean to miss it
Guest- Guest
- Post n°76
Re: did he mean to miss it
Guest- Guest
- Post n°77
Re: did he mean to miss it
but do you think football is %100 clean.
every other sport has had bungs ect so why not our leagues.
im convinced refs are corrupt. not all of them. think about it they all support football teams. how else did they became refs.
i seen to many dodgy decession in my life.
the one that proves it was the carlin cup final aston v man u when after about 5 mins rio brings down a villa player and no red.
Guest- Guest
- Post n°78
Re: did he mean to miss it
Guest- Guest
- Post n°79
Re: did he mean to miss it
as much as i respect fergie for what hes done at man u i rekon when he retires the league will become a level playing feild.
didnt they go 10 years without given a pen at old trafford
Guest- Guest
- Post n°80
Re: did he mean to miss it
BazSpur- Admin
- Post n°81
Re: did he mean to miss it
ionman34- Champions League
- Post n°82
Re: did he mean to miss it
BazSpur wrote:I'd like to know, why the random picture of a sheep? have I missed something.
I don't think so mate, nor do I think it was random.
Your suspicions I would deem correct.
BazSpur- Admin
- Post n°83
Re: did he mean to miss it
Guest- Guest
- Post n°84
Re: did he mean to miss it
take a bow son.
ionman34- Champions League
- Post n°85
Re: did he mean to miss it
Your entire existence on here is to wind up, you are in constant arguments with more than 90% of the posters here and, as it turns out, have managed to get yourself banned from Facebook, a feat I thought was nigh on impossible, because you don't give a sh*t about anyone elses opinion, just your own, which really wouldn't be an issue if you were actually able to back it up. You can't though, for all the stats you post others can post stats to disprove your theories. When posed difficult questions you ignore them and just repeat what you posted before, despite whatever it was being blown out of the water.
What is most laughable is the fact that you bang on about people being entitled to their opinions but you ignore everyone elses. It is impossible to debate with you because, no matter how many times you are proven wrong (99.99999999999% of the time) you ignore the proof and carry on the same tired, worn, dubious and inaccurate diatribe over and over again.
Now you are taking a shot at probably the most tolerant poster on here, Baz. Because he doesn't agree with you then you accuse him of not having his own mind. Is this the same for Arnie, Mark, Lee, Vis, DJ and just about everyone else on the board? Because they all disagree with you the vast majority of the time too.
You lack coherence, you lack original thought. You second guess after the fact every time and constantly pick up on errors or faults no matter how miniscule. You accuse certain players of not doing their jobs but defend one in particular when he makes an even worse showing. You constantly bang on about players we have ejected when they can't even perform in sides struggling to remain in the Prem. You back every flavour of the Month manager over our own ..... EVERY TIME ....... Yet never give them a single mention when they go tits up.
Where is Coppell now eh?
It is at about this point where you ignore everything above, apart from the bit about you constantly arguing, and use that to take a shot at me. yes I argue a great deal, but the difference is that I really DO back myself. It never occurs to you that others agree with me because I'm right does it, you just use that worn out old excuse that others are bullied into agreeing with me.
I wonder if Lew, Baz, Lobo or Vis would agree with you there.
What you do not seem to be able to comprehend is that you do not lose face by admitting you are wrong, particularly in the face of overwhelming evidence contradicting your own statements. It seems you are willing to listen to people that agree with you but completely blank those you don't. It is this that has me convinced that you will ignore almost the entirety of this post as you won't have a single rebuttal to it, apart from taking a pop at the arguments I've had, pretty much like this one.
So there you have it Lought, pretty much my thoughts and opinions on the way you have been posting for the last few months. Let's face it, I'm not alone here am I. I challenge you to defend yourself and prove me wrong. Shoot me down and I will offer you my sincerest and humblest apologies, that I promise you.
I hasten to add that I haven't been abusive or nasty, sarcastic maybe (just a little) but not nasty. If you would just take on a little of what we as a group say then it will all be worth it because I have been one of those posters avoiding the site, somewhat, because I'm fed up with your constant griping, it's not even close to being constructive.
Ball's in your court.
BazSpur- Admin
- Post n°86
Re: did he mean to miss it
MarkA249- Premiership
- Post n°87
Re: did he mean to miss it
Guest- Guest
- Post n°89
Re: did he mean to miss it
all i said was defoe missed a sitter and he did. some players on here seem to be expempt from crictissium. ade great hold up play but hes shootin is woefull.
ion at some point you have had arguments with everyone just like i have. now your trying to get people on your side wich is sad.
i know vis lee dj dont agree with me on this occasion but i know if they did agree with me they would say so. I think you would aswell.
the sheep joke was a cheap joke. i seen enough little digs at me recently now im gettin slatted for having one back..
a few months back baz stuck up for me and said i can post what i want as you go on other boards and you get far worse from spurs fans.
but how comes its these sort of post that get people posting.
if you scroll down the forum you will find so many good post from me and everyone that gets ignored.
things would be so boring if everyone agress with everyone
MarkA249- Premiership
- Post n°90
Re: did he mean to miss it
Guest- Guest
- Post n°92
Re: did he mean to miss it
i belong to 4 others pages 2 of wich are good because you can say what you want aslong as its not raciest jokes and voilent threats.
HotspurRoper- Moderator
- Post n°93
Re: did he mean to miss it
ionman34- Champions League
- Post n°94
Re: did he mean to miss it
Never said it did. But when 99% of everyone else disagrees with you, and proof is put up that you are wrong ............. it means that YOU ARE WRONG. Your trouble is that you ignore that and, as I stated earlier, carry on with the same tired diatribe that just got minced. It is at that point that you P*ss just about everybody off.
all i said was defoe missed a sitter and he did. some players on here seem to be expempt from crictissium.
Like Pav?
You said more than he just missed a sitter too, you questioned his honesty, suggesting that he did it on purpose. That isn't criticism, that's tantamount to an accusation of him throwing the game.
ade great hold up play but hes shootin is woefull.
WTF has he to do with this? Quit trying to shift the focus.
ion at some point you have had arguments with everyone just like i have. now your trying to get people on your side wich is sad.
Oh f*ck off Lought. If all the years you've been on here haven't taught you that I don't give a flying f*ck what I'm thought of then it shows your complete lack of ability to learn the simplest thing. I argue until proven right or wrong. The fact that I've gotten into barneys with Vis, Lobo, yourself, Dave, Nic and Lew should be proof enough that 'being popular' isn't high on my list of priorities. The fact that the mutual respect is still there should tell you that this is because I don't talk bollox.
i know vis lee dj dont agree with me on this occasion but i know if they did agree with me they would say so. I think you would aswell.
And I have done when I feel you're right. I've even defended you and backed you up with argument of my own when I thought you right, as have others. Now this really should ring a bell with you. All those people who, at one stage or another, have backed your argument disagree with you, en masse, and you STILL think they are all wrong, then accuse them of being Sheep or 'sucking up'. This is nothing more than a childish mentality refusing to accept when you are wrong. Stubborn petulance springs to mind.
the sheep joke was a cheap joke. i seen enough little digs at me recently now im gettin slatted for having one back..
You have been slated because you simply will not listen or accept that you are wrong. We have ALL tried to reason with you but you ignore reason. When it gets to that point then you will be criticised and rightly so. Yours was a cheap dig at one person that you singled out and, IMO, an apology is meritted.
a few months back baz stuck up for me and said i can post what i want as you go on other boards and you get far worse from spurs fans.
That doesn't mean you go out of your way to wind everyone up! Listen mate, you do well with picking topics for us to chew over and you are most definitely entitled to your opinion on it, but being the first to post that opinion doesn't mean you are right. First in is definately not best dressed here.
I'll make a suggestion to you, treat this, and every other board, as educational. You have access to thousands of fans with varied knowledge of the game and life in general. There is a diversity of age and experience on the Net, you just need to develop the ability to sort the Wheat from the chaff or, in laymans terms, who's talking sense and who's talking bollox. But the most important thing you need is an open mind, without that you will never learn a thing. Have your opinion by all means, but allow yourself the opportunity to accept that your opinion just may be miles wide of the mark. If an argument is put up that affirms your opinion then all well and good, but if another comes along that offers just as compelling an argument against then you need to assimilate that information and MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND. On that I really don't have a doubt that you'll have a problem as I think you feel it is important to be your own man. This is a good thing, but it can be taken too far and prevent you from expanding your horizons.
Basically what I am saying is don't blank out a counterargument until you give yourself the opportunity to absorb all of the information, and reach a considered conclusion from seeing both sides rather than one.
but how comes its these sort of post that get people posting.
Look at the content. It is controversial and that got people indignant, causing them to argue against your question. You then turned a question into an assertion and refused to back down from it until your motives were questioned and your affiliations too. A good OP poses the question then asks further questions of those that answer to keep the ball rolling. You do the first part well, but after that you are not interested in any counterargument, you are just looking for agreement. As we have seen all too often, one person in agreement is all you need to cast your mind in stone, no matter how many cast Iron arguments against your assertion are put forward.
if you scroll down the forum you will find so many good post from me and everyone that gets ignored.
No they are not ignored, they are answered. It is very difficult to debate a point when someone puts an argument forward that everyone agrees with, what is there to debate? It has no bearing on the question, which may well have been a very good one, but it bears mightily on the answers. What do you want to see, one good answer followed by 5 pages of 'good post, couldn't agree more', or some halfwit arguing for the sake of it so that the same answer is rehashed over and over again to no effect? That's not debate, that's trolling.
things would be so boring if everyone agress with everyone
Yes they would, but that doesn't mean that the disagreement is right, particularly if PROVEN wrong, or at least an argument is put forward that cannot be refuted. That is the entire point of argument Lought, not to fight but to convince others that your opinion is correct. Argument isn't fighting, it is supposed to be intellectually stimulating with a view to being enlightening. Enlightenment only comes if your mind is open enough to accept new ideas and to accept that yours may just be wrong.
It is this that I have been trying to get across to you for years now, this and the fact that you really don't stop to think before you post at times. You post on whims that are fairly easy pickings for a considered argument then force the argument to spiral out of control with your intractability. Believe me, I personally wouldn't think any less of you were you to admit you were wrong when proven so. If anything my estimation of you would go sky high, knowing that you had opened your mind up to other possibilities. We already accept when you are right and, as said previously, will back you up every time when you are.
OK, I've said my piece now. All of the above comes from a friend Lought. As exasperated as I get with you, I still think you have a heart of Gold which is why I really want you to take this on board. If I didn't like you I wouldn't bother. As I said in my previous post, the ball is in your court.
Thu Jan 21 2021, 20:01 by BazSpur
» Sky Sports News Links
Thu Oct 29 2020, 18:13 by DJSR
» Hello....the site is still alive!
Thu Oct 29 2020, 18:11 by DJSR
» 17 million deal for Musacchio
Fri Feb 24 2017, 18:39 by souptheyid
» How to Block Adverts on this Site !
Fri Feb 24 2017, 18:36 by souptheyid
» This is Our Season
Sun Aug 14 2016, 00:54 by vis
» 'appy New Season
Sat Aug 29 2015, 08:09 by BazSpur
» Time to say goodbye
Fri Aug 28 2015, 21:37 by Maximus
» Crouchinio
Thu Jan 15 2015, 03:00 by vis