Match Thread Versus Queens Park Rangers

2nd half more like it should of done it at the start started Vertonghen left back and started Caulker just like i said need to play at lot better next week at Old Trafford though

Big Vertonghen ooozes class Centre half left back great at both and that tackle was outstanding on Hoilett signing of the season ? early days but could be

vis wrote:Firstly full respect & credit to QPR. They came with a team & a game plan and, it has to be said, were unlucky not to get a point. But do I care? Of course I don't . . . .

1st half by us was poor but not awful. Conceded possession far too easily. 2nd half so much better. That's that monkey off AVB's & the teams back. Onwards and upwards. Big V is something special . . . .

What Vis said ...saves me typing it out.

I do like Caulker and Verts very much ..

we won at home !

one thing that winds me up is our players are so greedy in front of goal. they could easy set each other up but went for glory

big teams dont do that.

Once again, AVB does it right. Saw his own mistake in the first half, changed it in the second and we looked completely different. A few things that stick out for me... Caulker is looking better than Gallas and Vertonghen is the best player we have.

Once we get injuries sorted out to Ade, Benny and Naughton I think we'll be able to control home games a lot better. A wins a win though and a team that wins when they weren't the best on the field tend to be a very good side.

I thought QPR's possesion play was superior to ours but our counter attacks better than theirs.

We mugged them off a deserved point which was the least they deserved but they did the same to us last season at Loftus Road.

They did alright with all their new signings so I'm expecting them to soon climb up the table.

play crap and win. love it

i would rest jan bale lennon dembelle on wednsday

Loughtonlegend wrote:one thing that winds me up is our players are so greedy in front of goal. they could easy set each other up but went for glory

big teams dont do that.

Guess this time last year harry would have been to blame lought ?LOL.
Avb is god then lought ?

well harry was 4 years into the job when he couldnt beat wolves at home then lost to stoke then blew 13 point lead.

avb been here 5 mins and is slowly changing things for the better.

vis wrote:Nice to see we are ALL finally happy with a Spurs win . . . . .

I'm a little like Sheldon on TBBT when it comes to




Is this an Oh moment for me too Vis ?

Just seen the goals on espn goals Caulkers header back for equaliser and big v carry to set up the winner. Like Lought said and others on Facebook would Harry have made the tactical changes to win the game

at half time tony gale said at last avb has changed things around. what an idiot not many managers changes things before half time.

some managers dont change things untill 60/70 mins

maybe harry wouldnt have needed to make any changes if we were set up properly from the start? just a thought, considering rangers were first to every lose ball/bad pass in the first half.

well harry didnt do many things rignt in that spell we lost a 13point lead.

wouldnt it be good if we go and score at man u next week. something we never did at there place in the league under harry

Do you feel confident, I don't ,our passing is just not sharp enough.good movement is broken down to easily With sloppy passes and dwelling to long on the ball

but this is our 3rd game with our new players.

when ade fit he will get back in the team then the ball will stick up the other end.

defoe scoring goals but thats it.

i though jan and bale worked well down the left second half